Title: Kiriakou & Nixon on the Latest Assange News
Show: Garland Nixon
Date: 2021-09-30
URL: https://youtu.be/N0SqIILhQN4
Duration: 38:00

---

[00:02] kidnapping assassination and a london shootout inside the ca cia's secret war plans are against wikileaks but it sounds to me more like cia's secret war plans against julian assange there's plenty to talk about i'm political analyst garland nixon and i'm former cia officer john kiriakou let's talk about julian assange [Music]

[00:51] well john it looks like captain russia gate michael isikoff has been up to his old shenanigans he wrote a story um and uh it was the cia's secret war plans against and he didn't even say who it was really against he said it was against wikileaks he had to de-personalize it it wasn't against a man who is a journalist i've read the story it's a bit of a long story a lot going on in that you john your thoughts why don't we do this for people who may not have read the story or maybe kind of

[01:21] just heard a bit about it why don't you kind of fill in the blanks what did we find out here well we found out that mike pompeo when he was the cia director was not just actively involved in in pursuing what was either an assassination attempt or an attempt to kidnap julian assange in london but he was the driving force behind this this plan this was a covert action uh plan which requires the president's signature on something called a presidential finding it has to

[01:53] go through the justice department it has to go through the uh the lawyers on the national security council then to the national security adviser before making its way to the president and this plan was so crazy as to defy any logic what it was was uh the cia was prepared working with british intelligence mi6 to engage in a shootout in front of the ecuadorian embassy in the knightsbridge section of london now if any of our

[02:25] viewers have been to knightsbridge that's where herod's department store is it's it's literally the nicest shopping district in the world it's like having a shootout at fifth avenue and and east 57th street uh it's it's insane to even contemplate uh a secondary plan that they had was in the event that julian actually made it out of the ecuadorian embassy and onto a plane presumably a russian diplomatic plane uh the plan was to shoot the tires of

[02:56] the plane out so that it couldn't take off now that's an act of war it's a violation of international treaties but this this crazy plan uh went all the way up to the president before at some point it was killed it it is crazy to me that donald trump may have been the adult in the room to say that this was too much it was more likely the national security adviser but uh you know if there were any doubts at all either either in the minds of

[03:28] people who aren't necessarily supportive of julian assange or in the mind of the judge who um who criticized julian assange despite ordering that he not be extradited to the united states this ought to put any doubts to rest well the other thing is this i feel like as soon as i see isakoff and i see the word russian anywhere i'm suspicious you know i look at it and you don't know i mean you know there's some truth in this story but you don't know how much is embellished and how much is window dressing and i just feel like they had

[03:59] to put in there oh and by the way the russians might have wanted to sneak them out of the country yeah they're still still trying to wait yeah they're in a way they're pushing that julian assange work with the russians that's already been debunked but they know that most people don't dig deep enough to know that that's right that's right mike isikoff you know used to be a serious uh investigative journalist he he was with the the washington post the new york times um he's a pulitzer prize winner he was the the lead investigative journalist at newsweek now he's at yahoo news this is supposed

[04:30] to be a serious guy but he did himself real damage serious damage to his reputation by not just latching on to the russiagate narrative when it was debunked rather than correct himself he doubled down on russiagate he also was one of the early authors uh to to publish a book about russiagate and then went on to have the entire book debunked so it's kind of hard to believe what he what he has to say with that said um he co-wrote this piece with two other

[05:01] yahoo news reporters and they say that they interviewed 30 former cia officers and white house staff members um with everybody telling the same story um i believe it we know mike pompeo we know mike pompeo has no respect for the law we know that mike pompeo had an obsession with wikileaks and julian assange because of the revelations that came out of the vault seven uh documents i i think mike pompeo tried to kill julian assange i think you're right let's look at the

[05:32] story right here and this is the part that freaks me out it says uh pompeo was seeking revenge that's one part of it and then when you go to the blast it says basically over they were so embarrassed over vault seven they were seeing blood seeking revenge seeing blood that's not about professionalism that's not about the law that's about i'm going i have an enemy and i have the ability to attack them to kill them i have the ability to use violence you know what that is that's

[06:02] tony soprano right there yeah when i hear someone say you know what this guy did something and i don't like him and i want to whack him that's you know what i mean i started thinking of words like bonanno and lucie and luciano that's what i started thinking about the man is acts uh it seems to me that he ran the cia and the state department like a crime boss yeah uh that that's exactly right and you know he was very very unpopular among cia people too for a couple of reasons

[06:34] first was that he he participated in six different bible study groups a week at the cia so rather than being in his office actually running the cia like he was supposed to be doing he was busy praying with six different uh evangelical bible study groups he also had this weird habit of signing all of his official correspondence with have a blessed day that's just not something that's that's done at the cia you know sure there are

[07:05] a lot of religious people like there are anywhere but keep it to yourself you got a job to do so people were generally happy to see him go he didn't leave a good impression at the cia you know another thing in here i'll have i'll find it but and this i found very very troubling one of the most troubling things here but it was a branch off of what happened to assange anyway if you read this story you'll find that they considered and discussed taking action against other journalists yes glenn greenwald i think was laura is

[07:35] there a pointless yeah yeah talk about your thoughts what are your thoughts on that you know in the whole article was a very long article but this to me was the most frightening part of it none of us should be surprised that the cia and mike pompeo were going after julian assange but to equate major investigative journalists with what they call information brokers would open up national security journalists to espionage charges just for doing journalism

[08:07] you know there's been an ongoing problem garland with the mainstream media not supporting julian assange you never read articles about julian in the washington post or the new york times you never hear about him on cnn or msnbc and rarely even on fox but um but what's really dangerous is that if people don't line up behind julian if they don't support julian's right to publish then they're next logically that's really what what the white house uh

[08:38] wants to do and i don't just mean the donald trump white house i mean this goes back to george w bush barack obama went after journalists donald trump certainly did joe biden hasn't changed the policy at all this is something that all journalists should be afraid of and you know to me and i don't know if you see it this way but i see it this way i've been saying this for a while this is the war on terror coming home this is 20 years of people getting accustomed to

[09:08] go to another country and you violate their laws you violate their rules you violate when you get in that other country there are no laws it's a battlefield you can do anything you want to right right the problem is you get accustomed to that and whenever they feel threatened whether it's julian assange or it's garland nixon john kiriakou someone jimmy dore whoever did they get accustomed to operating in an environment where there's no rule let me tell you something real quick that i was a cop from you know i retired 20 some years right right and one of the things and i'm going to admit it one of the things i got accustomed to was not

[09:40] paying any attention to the rules when you're a cop you're pulling over here you got they go say call the we need you to check on this you put over this way you barely use your blinker people get out of your way even when your lights are not on you're flipping around to go this array that direction whatever right and you get accustomed to paying no attention to the um traffic signals because you're doing stuff you're responding to [ __ ] right right and once i retired i had to get my i kept getting pulled over by cops because i was like turning them pulling

[10:10] a stop sign screw this go this way that way and you're they pull you over and i show my badge and i say look i just retired and they'd be like i understand they can't have that problem on the weekends when i'm out but but i say that's a long version of saying this the war on terror has produced a government that is accustomed to acting in a lawless manner first in one iraq when they invaded it then libya then they expanded it if africom they expanded into more and more countries and it's coming home and now they're acting lawlessness in england and if

[10:41] they're doing it in england you know they're doing it right here in the united states and that's the crazy part of this garland this isn't you know we're not talking about doing it in the streets of kabul or khartoum or sana we're talking about knightsbridge london here we're talking about the british agreeing to be the lead in the shootout we're talking about a shootout in a civilian neighborhood right an upscale very upscale neighborhood we're also talking about the murder of an australian citizen not some terrorist

[11:13] from afghanistan or pakistan or whatever an australian national australia is a five-eyes country the five eyes countries are the us uk canada australia and new zealand they share all their intelligence they they don't recruit each other's citizens they don't do operations on each other's soil unless they're joint operations but to murder or kidnap a five eyes citizen tells me that the australians were also involved in this

[11:44] well here's the other part let's be square about this if they were knowingly unwittingly if we're honest about ourself and this is coming out it's becoming blatantly obvious obvious as um joe biden continues with um donald trump's america first craziness right if you are there are no allies to the u.s empire you're a vassal of convenience yes and um let's face it i don't know how familiar you are with it but the united states basically overthrew the government of australia in

[12:14] 1975 and replaced the replace the prime minister yeah um so the reality is if you look what happened with france lately what did france learned france learned that that the u.s empire and its vassal states is a hierarchy and france you ain't at the top of the hierarchy they just learn that so i think part of it what you're saying is also part of um what i think is the weakening of the us as the world hegemon there are a number of cracks in the dam but i think one of the cracks in the dam

[12:45] are the um the other countries like europe and australia waking up to figure out where am i in this hierarchy and am i comfortable with where i am in this hierarchy right and the hierarchy keeps changing i mean the last couple of years anyway there have been a lot of changes and i i'm glad at least that there was somebody at some point and i'm thinking it probably was the national security adviser whoever

[13:16] i was gonna say would have been there were so many of them under donald trump um it would have been um wasn't mattis was it no no mattis was sex but it would have been at the same time uh with mattis uh but anyway yeah there there had to be somebody to say wait a minute stop this is crazy it's not like we're trying to take out you know ayman zawahiri in some cave somewhere right this is this is julian assange

[13:47] in uh in knightsbridge london and then you know you're going to eventually have to answer to to courts there's going to be a federal judge who says uh well did you go through the the process to extradite him to the united states and at that point the answer was no they hadn't they just decided ah we're just gonna start a shootout in the streets and we're just gonna kill him and if we can't kill him we'll shoot the plane and the other part of it is and and this is what i think is dangerous i thought it was bad with that guy there

[14:18] was a guy that named i think is he from chicago i think his name was padilla and they yeah him as a as basically they read they came up with a new classification for him they said you go under this classification therefore you have no constitutional rights yeah he was an enemy combatant and they put him in a navy brig in charleston south carolina and he appealed and went all the way to up to the supreme court and the supreme court said tough luck you're an enemy combatant exactly and that i think that was a bad thing for this reason because

[14:49] here um they decided to call what was it they were going to call um information brokers they were going to call glenn greenwald and others and the person who made the document about snowden and so what we found and this is just a bastardization of of law hey i can't assassinate or do you take this um extra judicial action against the citizen i'll just come up with a new name i'll call him a fig womb he's a fig womp and according to this law that i

[15:20] just wrote fig it's open season on fig womb's boom take him out and that's all they're doing they're like there's no legal way that we can assassinate this guy for what he did especially when he hasn't been convicted of doing anything wrong and guess what you're gonna have to start assassinating people with the new york times the one opposed to the guardian because they all put it out too and the dangerous part is whether it's garland nixon or glenn greenwald or assange all we got to do is come up with a new name a definition for that new name and then

[15:52] determine the state then what laws what rights what whatever applies to that new name that's then you have no constitution if you can simply reclassify citizens or human beings as something that's outside of the law yeah and let me tell you how this works bureaucratically somebody at the cia in this case apparently it was uh mike pompeo comes up up with an idea to uh to carry out an assassination against the likes of julian assange so they put it

[16:22] in this very specific format and they send it from the cia to the to the justice department's office of legal counsel olc the notorious office of legal counsel where john you was what exactly exactly john you and jay bybee during the bush administration now the problem with olc is they're supposed to be the deep thinkers at justice they're supposed to be the ones to tell the cia whether something is legal or illegal but they wrecked their reputation by justifying the

[16:54] torture program by justifying international extraordinary renditions by justifying a secret prison system and so what they do is they'll come up with the craziest unlikeliest legal interpretation to declare legal whatever it is the cia wants them to declare legal and once they sign off on it it goes to the team of lawyers in the general counsel's office of the national

[17:26] security council so once those lawyers chop on it and then they they meet with the cia's lawyers to to come up with acceptable language in this thing for everybody then it goes to the national security advisor for a signature once the national security advisor approves of it it goes to the president they make a clean copy they call it a presidential finding the president signs it and then copies go to the office of the director of national intelligence to the national security advisor to the

[17:57] director of the cia and to the operations center of the cia where it's kept in a safe what you might have noticed is nowhere in that whole scenario does it ever get before a judge and in many cases it won't even get before the oversight committees now here's the real you know turd in the room anytime there is a covert action program

[18:27] it has to be briefed to the oversight committees because the oversight committees have to authorize it in the form of an authorization bill and they have to fund it through a top secret appropriations bill now they'll bury it somewhere in the in the defense budget so nobody notices it uh but if the cia deems that the operation is counter intelligence in nature and 99 times out of 100 that's dealing

[18:57] with a mole inside the cia maybe there's a russian mole a chinese mole whatever then they don't have to brief it to the hill so all they had to do is say the magic words that wikileaks is a non-state hostile intelligence service you know people didn't really make much when mike pompeo said that in public they said oh pompeo it's not an intelligence service why is he saying something that like that he did it on purpose

[19:28] that was a signal that we're not going to the oversight committees with this and that's what happened the oversight committees didn't know anything about this operation yeah and and and um when we look at it the other part of it is this it wasn't it was a acknowledgement when you read it it's obvious that um and i think it actually says it in there that basically um pompeo really could care less about the law he didn't care he didn't care concerned it was dog garnered he'd it was that

[19:59] george w bush cowboy mindset it was that nixon if the guy if the president does this it's not illegal and he had gotten to that arrogant machiavellian really um autocratic totalitarian mindset that people who get power they get drunk with the power and then they begin to believe that they're doing good so that it doesn't matter the law is for our lessers the law are sort of little the littles down there because we're the good guys they convince themselves

[20:31] they're the good guys so they can do whatever they want yeah and i i was a cop i saw that on a small scale you know i'm sure you saw it on a large sale i as a cop i saw it on a small scale in that i knew and listened to the discussion you know the locker room discussion of cops and you hear that stuff you hear the kind of conversations you hear people who refer to yeah you know i came out there was a couple of dirt bags standing on the corner a couple of d what they're saying is basically the people in the community a dirt bag

[21:01] they're not human beings they're just a couple of those other things there so once you become men to think like that that you're better than they are their lives aren't valuable they have no rights they're dirt bags they're not human beings and and you see that mindset i saw it in law enforcement i'm sure you saw it in the things that you did and what happens is that's when people wander off into crazy land and they get to where mike pompeo was here and to be honest just trying to do this just coming to the

[21:33] white house with this should have been enough to say this guy can't be cia anymore and he can't hold any other position he's a dangerous man you are exactly right you know when i was when i was still working at the cia and for those of you who think i'm still in the cia shame on you uh but when i was at the when i was at the cia we received a cable from a large overseas station asking permission to carry out an assassination this is immediately post 911 and uh i was the morning briefer for the the director and the deputy directors

[22:05] and so i briefed it i said we we have this cable in from so and so and they're asking for permission to uh to carry out an assassination i had never seen a cable like this before i had never seen anything in writing ever asking for permission to kill somebody the deputy director for operations was so appalled that someone would put this in writing he instructed me not to respond to the cable and i said well i mean he's going to call right the person who wrote the cable is going to call and

[22:36] ask what's going on and he said either don't take the call or when he calls tell him he's an idiot and hang up on him well he got the message he never he never called we just never responded to the cable but then to be so bold and so and so over the top to actually come up with a plan to murder julian assange and then to brief it so widely that 30 people are willing to go to a to a journalist and um and confirm it

[23:10] i if i had been president i would have fired pompeo on the spot well yeah chicken patty makes a good point and that is pompeo admitted cia lied cheated and stole but he left out the murder part but i think that came apart okay you know that just came with it but the thing about it is you know when pompeo said that i've never heard anybody say that before you know when pompeo said that and laughed about it in a sociopathic kind of way and i i gotta be honest i look you know no i'm no psychologist i read the

[23:41] sociopath next door you know i mean i did too great look oh my gosh yeah i love doing i've read rally bought it for me yeah awesome book it is and but you know based on my limited knowledge it wouldn't shock me if i compared the standards for a sociopath and that i saw you know and i looked in that book and there was a picture of mike you know mike pompeo with the arrow pointing like right listen man they're all sociopaths yes a cia psychiatrist once told me that the

[24:12] cia actively seeks to hire people who have sociopathic tendencies not sociopaths because sociopaths are impossible to control right they have no conscience and they just blow right through the the polygraph exam because they're unable to feel remorse or regret the thing is is that the cia is like you know a fortune 500 company where the sociopaths slip through the cracks and they rise to the top to these leadership positions for the exact reason that

[24:44] they're willing to step on the backs of everybody around them to make their way to the top and then once they make their way to the top they fall into that same pattern of not thinking that the rules apply to them and uh and they're perfectly willing to carry out crimes against humanity or or war crimes well you know look one of the things that you read and i'll name two names and then when i saw them boy i'm not saying they're sociopaths i'm just saying my eyes bugged out what happens

[25:14] fiona hill you know who that is oh sure the another one is um uh flower noir hillary's girl yeah yeah both when i looked at them and i saw that jaw that is there's no smiles there there's no emotion there it's and the dead shark eyes those great white eyes just before he clamps down on you you know just before he bites that seal in half those dead shark eyes there's no life in them and i looked at

[25:45] him and i'm like oh my god so i understand what you're saying because when i see the neocons neo pecan is just oh my god you know yeah and i and there's just so many of them you know when they had that ukraine hearing and they start marching the um you know the the fiona hills and these kind of people through one after one and i'm looking at these people and i'm like man that person right there hasn't had a happy feeling in their life since 1977. yep there is some scary stuff

[26:18] you've got that right hey may i respond garland 2 to coop w uh who writes why would the cia allow their agents to be friends with someone who sold them out you would think you would be the last guy that had current intel or am i missing something you're missing a whole lot uh first of all i didn't sell anybody out i called out the cia for violating both u.s and international law second you make a very broad assumption that that

[26:48] i'm unpopular at the cia 70 cia officers signed a letter to president obama asking him to pardon me because there are a lot of people at the cia who believe that the cia should work within the confines of the law and so i'm in touch with a whole lot of cia people on a daily basis you you have a view of the cia in your mind that's just simply incorrect yeah i mean we know and we know people so many people uh ray mcgovern i think

[27:20] phil giraldi is indeed former ceo giraldi you spent 32 years as a cia officer yes yeah so we know a number of people they can look up what is it veteran intelligence uh professionals for san antonio yeah so there are a lot of people out here and again you know you know and i'll say this i mean i'm going to get straight too far but i deal with the same thing like being ex-cop where people are like you're a law enforcement officer how can i trust you you're probably reporting everything back to them you have nothing better to do with your time yeah i'm retired they're not paying

[27:51] me anymore but i'm doing it just for the good of the order you know i think i was a pain in the neck to them when i was there that's right i know i was they were probably happy to see me go but at any rate looking at this um the other thing is uh looking at this and you always got to call out the media and that is yes this should be a number two things this should be the number one story for a week but number two in a just society

[28:22] which this it clearly isn't there would have to be congressional hearings there would have to be the congressional oversight board calling in these 30 people seeing if someone needs to be prosecuted ensuring that they see if the rules need to be changed i mean whatever but there should be like a gigantic both house and senate hearing the tell here is the the tell that there is no truly no oversight over the cia is congress ain't saying a word not a

[28:54] single word garland this is such an important point that you're making i i looked specifically for statements any statements by people who are supposed to be on the right side on these issues like for example senator dianne feinstein former chairwoman of the senate intelligence committee or senator ron wyden the the progressive democrat from oregon these are the people we're supposed to turn to to make sure that the cia operates within the confines of the law not a

[29:26] single word not from any of the democrats on either the senate committee or the house committee nothing and add this here's what makes it even more conspicuous i'm not going to say oh they're not doing their jobs or oh they're selling or oh they're blah blah blah conspicuous you know almost as this behind the scenes they've made a decision not to touch it which i kind of think they have yes because pompeo was part of the evil trump regime so

[29:56] anything around trump you're supposed to attack if you're a democrat if you're blue it should be blood in the water oh my god look what we found that happened in the trump regime what we need to do is find out that it went all the way up to trump so we can now finally prosecute trump and pompeo for this and ensure that in 2024 donald trump can't run again that's what i would think i would hear from the democrats if they weren't bull crapping me exactly exactly we're not hearing anything you know i i've mentioned this before and

[30:27] forgive me if i'm repeating myself but when i got out of prison i spent 23 months in prison after blowing the whistle on the cia's torch program when i got home i happened to be in a vet here in washington and senator ron wyden was at the event and he was generally a supporter of mine but when push came to shove you know he really didn't do anything to to help he made a couple of nice statements but didn't really do anything substantive so i went up to him and i i told him you know frankly i was i was disappointed i

[30:58] had expected a little bit more and he got angry and defensive and he said look it took everything i had just to not lose my security clearance and man that just so crystallized everything for me that even the people who are supposed to be tough on the cia they just don't have the guts to open their mouths because they're going to be stripped of their access and if they're stripped of their access then they have nothing in

[31:29] washington there's no power there's no authority they're irrelevant and what the other part of it is this and if that happens you know what the other half is and that is the machine's going to cut your money out they're going to rewrite redraw your district you're out the door if you go about it so it was that was the thing again that shows that this is undemocratic that's right it shows that these are people that are operating outside of the constraints of democracy they have captured democracy so both the corporations and the intelligence

[32:00] community but i repeat myself they have captured democracy in a way that now um we use the term democracy that ain't it if the elected representatives do not have oversight authority which they don't if you are being threatened for the use of your oversight authority clearly you don't have any then we have to redefine what this country is because you know americans are like this is a democracy and we can reign in there's no reigning in the inmates truly are controlling the asylum

[32:31] you have that right the inmates are controlling the asylum and it wasn't always like that you know it tended to be cyclical where we saw you know between 1975 and and about 1993 or 95 that there really was real oversight uh congress was serious about it they were intimately involved in the day-to-day operations of the cia and that that all began to change in the 90s and then of course the 911 attacks changed

[33:02] everything apparently permanently here we are 20 years later and congressional oversight is at its weakest point really since the oversight committees were created yeah it's it's we will we can't get anything like the church committee we can't get anything really um because um the the various what what used to what did we used to call them we used to call them special interest groups or interest groups but we've got a couple of interest groups that own everything that have kind of combined to a point where

[33:33] they're kind of bored on us you know where they've kind of come together so much that there's no that is there a dental delineation when the the guy who is the new secretary to the air force of the air force came from raytheon when the secretary of defense came from raytheon exactly secretary of density defense came from raytheon is there a delineation between our pentagon and raytheon yes you're exactly right you know this is what makes things so ugly here in washington is this revolving door you know

[34:03] i disagree with donald trump on 99 of the issues but when he called washington a swamp he's he was right it is a swamp um he didn't do anything to make it better certainly if anything it got worse under donald trump but there is this revolving door especially in defense and national security between the big uh weapons manufacturers and uh and defense and cia you know the last thing i want to touch base before we go is i think well because i don't think this case is on

[34:35] the up and up the extradition case it is a it is kabuki theater it's not going to matter but in the real world the discussion about whether julian hassan should initially come in london was whether or not he could be executed because england couldn't ex could not extradite any uh person to a country where they could face execution the u.s oh we won't kill him then the next discussion was well maybe he'll kill himself so this that all about whether or not he'll die i would argue that now that it has come out that

[35:05] the u.s intelligence committee's considered i mean a community is considered an extrajudicial killing that there is no way that he should be extradited to the u.s because you can have an agreement with the u.s that they won't um kill him judicially you can have an agreement that that that going by the rules they won't kill them but there's they have already demonstrated and in particular when it comes to julian assange that they have no respect for the rules so joe biden might say hey i'm

[35:37] not going to do it trump might be back in in 2024 or pompeo who the hell ever and they're like glad we're back hey do me a favor can you go over there in epstein julian assange you know i i have to say that after after everything that uh that the um the judge the british judge what was her name barrett not yes um you know she she essentially mocked uh uh the idea that julian was in any

[36:08] danger were he to be extradited to the united states well now that the case is is up for appeal i i think that no british judge in his or her right mind would approve of an extradition now because now the us the plan for for julian and wikileaks has been laid bare it's clear that the guy is just not going to make it here john two things think about what has happened and i wonder if these things weren't an accident

[36:40] but to the two things that have happened is this guy's sega sigi or whatever his name right right this guy comes out and basically says up in iceland everything i said was a lie i'm sorry my testimony testimony about assange was all lies about him action so that has completely fallen apart now these people come out and they're like they were going to kill him so that's so their case is falling apart and the argument that julian assange's life would be in any way safe is completely gone it's almost like

[37:11] they're and i may be wrong some of these things may be serendipitous but it's almost like there are entities that are making moves to make it harder for assange for them to convict assad you know when when the fbi's star witness is a convicted pedophile admitted embezzler uh who uh confessed to having made up his access to both wikileaks and julian assange and then in light of an assassination

[37:44] kidnapping plan they have nothing there there's no there's no case no nothing it's time for the justice department to just walk away from this you know what it has been revealed for exactly what mike pompeo said it was in this article yes naked revenge they saw blood due to vault 7 and they said what can we use to get him i'm sure a lot of lawyers looked at it and said we don't really have a case and they said we

[38:15] don't care we want to kill him anyway so if we get him here hey the guards will fall asleep the cameras will turn off and he'll hang himself precisely well thanks a lot garland nixon and john kiriakou here make sure that you share and subscribe you subscribe and hit the little bell so that you get um so that you get ideally hopefully notifications you share this on all of your uh platform all of your um social media platforms that you um ask all your friends to subscribe also and look out for john and i will be we'll be around for a while peace we're

[38:47] out good night everybody
