Title: Valuetainment
Show: Valuetainment
Date: 2026-04-25
URL: https://youtu.be/vb8nK12TbnM
Duration: 9:00

---

[00:00] if you still were at the CIA today and you got the call from the director of CIA and they said, you know, John, I want you to go find out because there's so much noise right now in the marketplace. I want you to go find out who is actually taking money from Israel, who's taking money from Qatar, Qatar, who's taking money from these different organizations, whether they are trying to get people to give pro- Zionist messaging or trying to give pro-Islam,

[00:30] you know, Sharia is not that bad, everything's okay, or socialism. How quickly would you be able to find out if someone's getting funded or not? I I I get that it's a hypothetical question. It's an FBI issue. The CIA by law would be forbidden from doing that on Americans, but uh but you could certainly look at uh at foreign nationals. The CIA could look at foreign nationals. It you probably need a couple of months to really dig it up, but you could dig it up. Would you be able to find out for a fact? Like if if not all of it. So the reason why I'm asking is because I had Dominic

[01:05] Tarjinski here. He is a EU parl member of the parliament and he tells the story of in 2022 these multiple EU parliament members were caught getting ah uh uh what do you call it oh yeah big suffion one of them was Greek and she she's in prison now yes yeah $1.5 million of cash you go to that one Rob where it's one is this one is this the one yeah So, $1.5 million. But go to if you can go to

[01:40] uh the picture. Yeah, that's the lady right there. Whatever her name is, she was part of the corruption. And apparently there was so much money in one of the duffel bags that they dropped $60,000, $60,000 that they caught afterwards where cash was being given. And then when you go even deeper, you find that the history of, you know, nowadays, you know, uh, King Charles is very pro-Islamist, you know, pro, it's not nothing wrong with that. Everything is fine. And then there were reports about him taking $3.2 million. I don't know if you've seen that

[02:11] report. Like he needs the money. Like he needs the money, but he took $3.2 million. You know, I hate to say it, Pat. Right there. Look at this. From between 2011 and 2015, then Prince Charles received approximately 3.2 $.2 million in cash payments from Qatari Prime Minister. This has been confirmed and he said he did, but he said the moment money went into our account, we just gave it to charity immediately. There was no illegal things done. You know, we're supposed to believe that. So, I wonder the you know, buying influence if if the government all of a sudden I

[02:42] don't even know if they would pursue this because because you know they may not even want that man. I if somebody was to come out like let's just say they did this with SPLC. Yeah. Yeah. And all of a sudden they come out and say, "Let me tell you guys that these top 50 influencers, who's funding them, who they're getting money from, it would silence the entire market and it would the fog of war in mainstream media and podcast and today would be gone. Everybody would say, "Okay, we know why you say what you say. We know where your position is. Great. Can we all move on? Let's move forward." This is exactly why we need robust oversight rather than the cheerleaders on Capitol

[03:17] Hill that we have. We need people who are really going to provide independent oversight. Let me tell you a story and forgive me that I have to sort of fudge the language a little bit, but I I need to I had a conversation with a senator a couple of days ago. Um he uh had somebody reach out. Can you come up to the office? I said, of course. I go up there and he's concerned about some documents. He needed to see some documents. documents that were classified in the 1970s. I

[03:49] said, "Well, they they should have been subject to mandatory declassification. We have a mandatory declassification law in this country after 30 or 35 years. They have to be declassified unless they contain the names of a source or um the methods of an ongoing operation." And he said, "Exactly." And they've never been declassified. And he said, "I went to the CIA and they said, "We don't know what you're talking about. They're not our documents." And it turns out that they're Senate documents. Well, the Senate is not the the Congress is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act and

[04:22] it's not subject they always exempt themselves from their own laws, right? So, no laws apply on Capitol Hill. They do anything they want. And so, I said, uh, well, why don't you go to leadership? And he said, I went to leadership and they said they don't want to get involved in this fight between two committee chairman. And I said, ' And the other chairman, he said, 'The other chairman told me to go screw myself. And I said, 'Are you kidding me? And he said, 'n no.' He said, 'I don't know what to do. And we sat there for two hours and we could not come up with

[04:56] a plan. And it's because there is no oversight. It's funny to me. You read the Constitution, the Constitution says that that the government is made up of three co-equal branches. the executive, the legislative, and the judicial. But that's just not how we treat it. The the the the legislative has seated its authority to the executive. And so now, if you know there's a Republican in the White House, Republicans on Capitol Hill are going to do everything they can to support the the president

[05:30] and to pass the president's legislation. The Democrats have somebody in the White House. The Democrats in Congress are going to do everything they can to support the president. That's not what the founding fathers envisioned. Three co-equal branches and then what we end up with is these so-called oversight committees that don't oversee anything. They just egg them on. Yeah, it is. So, I think I think the the part with America that when when I hear people that are tired,

[06:02] I'm like, what are you tired with? What are you most upset with? I just don't think there's any accountability. That's exactly the problem. Yeah. I just don't think there's any accountability. What do you mean? It seems like they're all on the same party. Seems like they're all protect. You hear that message, right? You can't have that because that's not good in a democracy. If there's accountability for the average person that does something and then there isn't for the other guys. What are you talking about? Yeah. No, there's not. So, I I I think this administration uh a story came out. I don't know if you saw the story came out yesterday saying that

[06:34] uh again it's a leak that they want Tulsi to resign after midterms. Okay. So, they want Tulsi to resign after midterms. All right. That story was leaked. I don't know if it's even a story there or not. There you go. Yeah. Director Donald Trump reportedly wants the director of national Okay. Who knows what these stories are? Like we asked you earlier, what stories do they leak? What do they not? and you kind of test the market. Who knows what this is, you know, on on how they're dropping a story. But to me, if there's anything this administration has

[07:04] a shot at increasing the score the people have in the CIA, in the FBI, in the US government a little bit more because the way it dropped after Kennedy is a oh my god, it's like a massive from 72% trust in the FBI. Can you pull up the history of trust in the US government or trust in the FBI or trust in the CIA and then Watergate and then Watergate, you know, one by one by one. Um there's a chart, Rob, if you go back and just go to images, you'll see it. Yeah, it's one of those that shows the

[07:40] high was 72% and I don't know what. Yeah. Zoom in a little bit if you could. Oh, it doesn't go all the way back. It doesn't go all the way back. So that goes from 97. The one I'm looking at is from the 60s, you know. Uh uh go on the second one. See what the saying the Pew Research. There you go. That's the one from 58. Wow. Look at that. We used to trust 72%. Look at that. We used to trust the government. We're like, "Yeah, they're good." You know, they're And then we're now in the 20s and the teens and that's 15. I would assume it's even lower today. Like even 911,

[08:11] it was barely 50%. Yep. Yep. That's right. Even 911 was 50%. At least we're like, look, they're the good people. They're here to protect us. Yeah. That there is a massive mass. And by the way, I think long-term, the lower that score goes, you you you you cannot risk not knowing the consequences of the score getting too low. That's right. Cuz if it gets too low, then what does the youth do who don't have anything to lose? Anything. The youngest is willing to break the whole thing because they're like, "Well, you know what? You guys are not doing anything. You guys

[08:43] are all protecting each other. You guys are wow and then you're dealing with a bigger problem. So I hope they do something to regain the faith. Hi everybody. I'm John Kuryaku, former CIA officer. Please find me on MC. We have a lot to talk about. CIA, FBI, DoD, torture, secret prisons, international renditions. Maybe you or your child want to apply for a job at the CIA and are looking for some tips. Let me know. There's a lot we can talk about. You pick the subject, we'll make it happen. Again, it's on MCT. Thanks and I'll see you soon. If you enjoyed this video, you want to

[09:18] watch more videos like this, click here. And if you want to watch the entire podcast, click here.
