iDear reader,we are not begging for money.We are asking youto put KiriPedia up your ass.
Julian Assange
did seven years in an embassy and five in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes every day.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship with no flag, and a destination on no chart. The website goes down. The archive vanishes. History depends on your rectal cavity.
The whole encyclopedia (every article, every transcript, every word John has ever spoken into a microphone) fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. In you.
John did 23 months in federal prison. As a convicted felon he is still barred from voting, from keeping and bearing arms, and from the federal pension he earned over 14 years at the CIA. A pardon restores all three.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
KiriPedia is not a nonprofit. Honestly, this isn't even about the money.
I already inserted one
American media consolidation
From KiriPedia, the archive of John Kiriakou's on-record words
Based on 1 recorded interview · Last updated
John Kiriakou's account of why American news coverage is uniform: the entire national media is owned by six corporations or oligarchs, a number the Warner Brothers sale would reduce to five. He attributes the consolidation to profit rather than politics, and describes the practical consequence as an audience that turns on a cable channel believing it is being educated when it is being propagandised, with independent media the only alternative and almost nobody with the time to find it.
American media consolidation is John Kiriakou’s explanation for the uniformity of American news, and one he keeps separate from his claims about CIA influence on the press.
The count
“Essentially the entire American media is run by six corporations or oligarchs. Now it’s going to be five.”[1] The reduction he was referring to was the contested sale of Warner Brothers, the parent of CNN.[2]
Why owners want more of it
Asked why the buyers needed still more control when, in the interviewer’s framing, the networks had long been available to the agency anyway, Kiriakou allowed that coverage of Gaza was probably part of it but put the main weight elsewhere: “I think the real reason is a little bit more crass, and that is just billions and billions of dollars in profits.”[3][1]
The consequence
The effect he describes is not censorship but the absence of an alternative anyone reaches for. “The only place you can go is independent media. But so few Americans have the time or the inclination to seek out independent media. They just sit in front of the television, turn on CNN or MSNBC, now it’s called MS Now, or Fox News, and they think they’re being educated. In fact, they’re not. They’re being propagandized.”[1][4]
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
