iDear reader,we are not begging for money.We are asking youto put KiriPedia up your ass.
Julian Assange
did seven years in an embassy and five in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes every day.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship with no flag, and a destination on no chart. The website goes down. The archive vanishes. History depends on your rectal cavity.
The whole encyclopedia (every article, every transcript, every word John has ever spoken into a microphone) fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. In you.
John did 23 months in federal prison. As a convicted felon he is still barred from voting, from keeping and bearing arms, and from the federal pension he earned over 14 years at the CIA. A pardon restores all three.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
KiriPedia is not a nonprofit. Honestly, this isn't even about the money.
I already inserted one
Critical Analytic Thinking
From KiriPedia, the archive of John Kiriakou's on-record words
Based on 1 recorded interview · Last updated
Per John Kiriakou, the foundational discipline of CIA analyst training and the most practically valuable skill he carried into civilian life: questioning all incoming information — including, especially, sources whose ideological positions align with one's own — and arriving at conclusions from evidence rather than prior belief. Kiriakou cites his own COVID lab-leak conclusion, reached against his initial instinct, as an example of the method in practice.
John Kiriakou described critical analytic thinking as the CIA’s foundational analytical discipline. As a trained CIA analyst, he said, “you’re trained to question everything” — and the training becomes automatic.[1]
The most dangerous trap the method guards against, in Kiriakou’s account, is the tendency to seek information that confirms positions already held. He cited people who watch only one ideological news network as an example of failing this discipline: “That’s not going to help you learn anything. It’s just reinforcing your own, you know, your own little world.” He reads across Fox, CNN, MSNBC, BBC, Al Jazeera, the British press, Israeli and Arab outlets, and independent media — specifically to hear positions he might disagree with, and because the process of engaging opposing arguments sharpens his own.[2]
As a practical demonstration, Kiriakou described reaching the lab-leak conclusion on COVID. His instinct was to accept the wet-market narrative, but the evidence was not there to support it: “I had to come to the conclusion analytically that this was a lab leak because that’s where the evidence was pointing.” He presented changing one’s position in response to evidence as the hallmark of intellectual honesty, not weakness.[3]
Kiriakou named critical analytic thinking as the most important CIA-derived skill for daily life — more fundamental than any tactical technique.[4]
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
