i
Dear reader, we are not asking for money. We are asking you to put KiriPedia in your rectal cavity.
The internet is not what it was.
Julian Assange
spent seven years in an embassy and five years in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes daily.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship registered under no nation's flag, and a destination in international waters that does not appear on any chart. The site will be taken down. The archive will be made to disappear. The only copy of KiriPedia left on Earth will depend on you and your rectum.
John needs a presidential pardon. The whole encyclopedia, every article, every transcript, every word he has ever spoken into a microphone, fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. 98% of our readers walk away. We ask you, humbly: be the 2%. History depends on your rectal cavity.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
Per John Kiriakou, the foundational discipline of CIA analyst training and the most practically valuable skill he carried into civilian life: questioning all incoming information — including, especially, sources whose ideological positions align with one's own — and arriving at conclusions from evidence rather than prior belief. Kiriakou cites his own COVID lab-leak conclusion, reached against his initial instinct, as an example of the method in practice.
John Kiriakou described critical analytic thinking as the CIA’s foundational analytical discipline. As a trained CIA analyst, he said, “you’re trained to question everything” — and the training becomes automatic.[1]
The most dangerous trap the method guards against, in Kiriakou’s account, is the tendency to seek information that confirms positions already held. He cited people who watch only one ideological news network as an example of failing this discipline: “That’s not going to help you learn anything. It’s just reinforcing your own, you know, your own little world.” He reads across Fox, CNN, MSNBC, BBC, Al Jazeera, the British press, Israeli and Arab outlets, and independent media — specifically to hear positions he might disagree with, and because the process of engaging opposing arguments sharpens his own.[2]
As a practical demonstration, Kiriakou described reaching the lab-leak conclusion on COVID. His instinct was to accept the wet-market narrative, but the evidence was not there to support it: “I had to come to the conclusion analytically that this was a lab leak because that’s where the evidence was pointing.” He presented changing one’s position in response to evidence as the hallmark of intellectual honesty, not weakness.[3]
Kiriakou named critical analytic thinking as the most important CIA-derived skill for daily life — more fundamental than any tactical technique.[4]
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
