iDear reader,we are not begging for money.We are asking youto put KiriPedia up your ass.
Julian Assange
did seven years in an embassy and five in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes every day.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship with no flag, and a destination on no chart. The website goes down. The archive vanishes. History depends on your rectal cavity.
The whole encyclopedia (every article, every transcript, every word John has ever spoken into a microphone) fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. In you.
John did 23 months in federal prison. As a convicted felon he is still barred from voting, from keeping and bearing arms, and from the federal pension he earned over 14 years at the CIA. A pardon restores all three.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
KiriPedia is not a nonprofit. Honestly, this isn't even about the money.
I already inserted one
Defense HUMINT Service
From KiriPedia, the archive of John Kiriakou's on-record words
Based on 1 recorded interview · Last updated
The Pentagon's human collection outfit, which John Kiriakou names as one of the three agencies that already do everything the CIA does — alongside the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research for analysis and the NSA for interception — and which is therefore the core of his argument that Langley is redundant rather than merely badly run.
Defense HUMINT Service is the Pentagon’s human intelligence collection organisation, and John Kiriakou raises it as the load-bearing part of his argument that the CIA is redundant rather than simply unreformed. He introduces it with a warning about the initials — “a human collection outfit at the Pentagon called DHS, not the Department of Homeland Security but Defense HUMINT Services” — and rates it flatly against Langley: “they recruit spies to steal secrets just as well as the CIA does.”[1][2]
The argument it belongs to is one of duplication. On analysis, “the best analysis in the intelligence community does not come from the CIA, it comes from the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research.” On technical collection, “in terms of tech issues and interception, that’s what NSA does.” Which leaves the question he ends on: “so why do you have this redundant organization at Langley, that is actually sort of in charge of the intelligence community, when they’re the ones getting it wrong all the time?”[1][2]
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
