iDear reader,we are not begging for money.We are asking youto put KiriPedia up your ass.
Julian Assange
did seven years in an embassy and five in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes every day.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship with no flag, and a destination on no chart. The website goes down. The archive vanishes. History depends on your rectal cavity.
The whole encyclopedia (every article, every transcript, every word John has ever spoken into a microphone) fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. In you.
John did 23 months in federal prison. As a convicted felon he is still barred from voting, from keeping and bearing arms, and from the federal pension he earned over 14 years at the CIA. A pardon restores all three.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
KiriPedia is not a nonprofit. Honestly, this isn't even about the money.
I already inserted one
Haaretz
From KiriPedia, the archive of John Kiriakou's on-record words
Based on 1 recorded interview · Last updated
The Israeli newspaper whose September 2026 investigation into Benjamin Netanyahu's handling of pre-October 7 warnings, including a direct phone call from UAE president Mohammed bin Zayed that Netanyahu allegedly kept from his own intelligence chiefs, John Kiriakou describes as sourced to the teeth, corroborated by The Jerusalem Post and The Times of Israel, and the biggest bombshell yet on whether Netanyahu let October 7 happen.
Haaretz is the Israeli daily newspaper whose September 2026 investigation into Benjamin Netanyahu’s handling of pre-October 7 warnings John Kiriakou has described as “easily the biggest bombshell yet regarding whether Netanyahu let October 7th happen.”[1]
Kiriakou’s assessment
Kiriakou frames Haaretz as the class of source that shifts a story from claim to record. It is, he says, “literally the most highly respected newspaper in all of Israel. A newspaper that has a gigantic budget for investigative journalism and they investigated the daylights out of this.”[2]
The 2026 investigation ran for two years and, per Kiriakou, was “by a very well-respected reporter who is sourced to the teeth. He dotted all the eyes, crossed all the tees.”[3]
The investigation
The findings, as Kiriakou summarises them from the report: Netanyahu received explicit warnings before October 7 from Mohammed bin Zayed and from Egyptian intelligence chief General Abbas Kamel; he told each “he had the situation under control”; and, per senior Shin Bet officials cited in the report, “never shared details of those warnings with his intelligence services. If he had, it could have changed their entire threat assessment picture.”[4][5]
Netanyahu’s response
Netanyahu “just announced plans to sue Haaretz for libel and he blasted the investigation as false.” The Prime Minister’s Bureau called the report “an absolute lie” and said Netanyahu “did not speak to the president of the UAE during the period in question, and he received no warning from him.” Kiriakou’s assessment of the suit is that “the lawsuit will probably not go very far” given the two-year sourcing.[3][5]
Corroboration
The story did not stand on Haaretz alone. Kiriakou notes that “the Jerusalem Post and the Times of Israel have both confirmed the Haaretz article”, and adds that “the moderate newspaper, The Times of Israel, has now confirmed the details of the reporting”, with “multiple senior officials” confirming the disputed call.[3][6]
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
