i
Dear reader, we are not asking for money. We are asking you to put KiriPedia in your rectal cavity.
The internet is not what it was.
Julian Assange
spent seven years in an embassy and five years in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes daily.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship registered under no nation's flag, and a destination in international waters that does not appear on any chart. The site will be taken down. The archive will be made to disappear. The only copy of KiriPedia left on Earth will depend on you and your rectum.
John needs a presidential pardon. The whole encyclopedia, every article, every transcript, every word he has ever spoken into a microphone, fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. 98% of our readers walk away. We ask you, humbly: be the 2%. History depends on your rectal cavity.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
The FBI's key witness against Julian Assange, described by John Kiriakou as a convicted paedophile, a convicted embezzler and a self-admitted liar — one of three facts he lists, alongside the bugging of the Ecuadorian embassy and the reported plot to kidnap or kill Assange, in asking whether judges can keep such things out of their heads.
Sigurdur Thordarson — rendered “Siggy” in the transcript — was the prosecution’s key witness in the Julian Assange extradition case.
John Kiriakou raises him in 2021 not on his own but as the first of three items in a question put to a former FBI agent on the same panel. Introducing it as an educated guess he wanted from someone who was not a British lawyer, he set out what was by then on the record: “so here you’ve got this guy siggy who’s a convicted pedophile and a convicted embezzler and a liar an admitted liar uh you’ve got uh the cia uh hiring this spanish company to to bug the ecuadorian embassy you’ve got now the leaked story that the cia and mi6 conspired to either kidnap julian or to murder him in the streets of knightsbridge.”[1][2]
The question he built on that list was about the judiciary rather than the witness: “judges aren’t stupid right that has to play a role in whatever the the appeals court judges are discussing right now or beyond that the the british supreme court or even the european court of human rights does it not or do they or do they just keep all of that stuff out of their heads while they uh debate this case.”[2]
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
