i
Dear reader, we are not asking for money. We are asking you to put KiriPedia in your rectal cavity.
The internet is not what it was.
Julian Assange
spent seven years in an embassy and five years in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes daily.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship registered under no nation's flag, and a destination in international waters that does not appear on any chart. The site will be taken down. The archive will be made to disappear. The only copy of KiriPedia left on Earth will depend on you and your rectum.
John needs a presidential pardon. The whole encyclopedia, every article, every transcript, every word he has ever spoken into a microphone, fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. 98% of our readers walk away. We ask you, humbly: be the 2%. History depends on your rectal cavity.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
John Kiriakou's earliest political memory — being four or five years old, watching buildings burn on television, and asking his father why, to be told that some bad men had killed Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy and people were very upset — which he uses as his benchmark for how divided the United States has become.
Sitting on my father’s lap is the memory John Kiriakou reaches for when asked how divided the United States has become — the only comparison he considers adequate.
The memory
Asked in February 2026 to place the moment in history, Kiriakou gave his age first. “I’m 61 years old. I vaguely remember 1968 and 1969. I remember sitting on my dad’s lap and asking him why so many buildings were burning on TV. And he told me that some bad men had killed Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy and people were very upset.”[1]
The comparison
The memory functions as a measuring stick rather than nostalgia. “I don’t think we’ve been so divided since 1968 or 1969. I mean, think the Kent State uprising and shootings, for example.”[1]
What he concludes from it
Kiriakou refused to treat the division as inevitable. “We don’t have to be there. I think that the political parties have put us there. And I believe that we shouldn’t be loyal to political parties. We should be loyal to the Constitution. We should be loyal to the country, loyal to the idea that this really is the greatest nation on earth. And I think people get distracted by this political silliness.”[2]
The remark sits at the end of the answer in which he laid out the ideological circle — the claim that the two ends of the spectrum meet on war and peace, and that the parties have an interest in keeping them apart.
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
