iDear reader,we are not begging for money.We are asking youto put KiriPedia up your ass.
Julian Assange
did seven years in an embassy and five in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes every day.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship with no flag, and a destination on no chart. The website goes down. The archive vanishes. History depends on your rectal cavity.
The whole encyclopedia (every article, every transcript, every word John has ever spoken into a microphone) fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. In you.
John did 23 months in federal prison. As a convicted felon he is still barred from voting, from keeping and bearing arms, and from the federal pension he earned over 14 years at the CIA. A pardon restores all three.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
KiriPedia is not a nonprofit. Honestly, this isn't even about the money.
I already inserted one
Spanish enclaves in North Africa
From KiriPedia, the archive of John Kiriakou's on-record words
Based on 1 recorded interview · Last updated
Ceuta and the smaller Spanish territories on the Moroccan coast, held under treaties more than four centuries old. In John Kiriakou's account they are colonial remnants that Morocco resents, that Israel has used to needle Spain over its criticism of Israeli occupation, and that United States policy now formally describes as an occupation.
Spain holds several small territories on the North African coast surrounded by Morocco, the largest of them Ceuta, opposite the Strait of Gibraltar, with further “teeny tiny” enclaves farther down the coast.[1][2] Kiriakou observes that most people do not know they exist, and that they are “remnants of colonial times”: the Moroccans dislike the arrangement, the Spanish like it, and it remains an unresolved irritant between the two states.[2][3]
The colonial argument
The enclaves give Israel a rhetorical opening against a country that has been among its sharpest European critics. As Spain condemns Israel as an occupying colonial power, Israel has “been trolling Spain for its colonial settlements in Africa like Ceuta.”[4] Kiriakou grants the point rather than dismissing it, while noting the difference in vintage: Spain was given the territories in treaties more than 400 years ago, “so a little less recent than Israel laid claims to places like Rafah and the West Bank. But you can see Israel’s point.”[4][5] Spain’s standing with Washington and Jerusalem is poor on other grounds too: it has refused the United States the use of Spanish airspace for military strikes, and Spanish public opinion has been among the most outspoken against Israeli conduct in Gaza.[4]
American policy
Kiriakou flags a post by Thomas Massie, whom he calls a friend of the programme, reporting that it had recently become official United States policy to oppose Spain’s colonies in Morocco, and to describe them as an occupation, accompanied by $40 million given to the Moroccan government.[6][7] Massie’s question, which Kiriakou repeats without answering, is how such language found its way into American law.[6] Kiriakou draws no direct link between this and the 2026 crossings, saying only that he has seen no direct evidence tying Israel to the surge but “would not be surprised at all” if American and Israeli intelligence knew what was coming and neither acted nor warned Madrid.[5][7]
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
