iDear reader,we are not begging for money.We are asking youto put KiriPedia up your ass.
Julian Assange
did seven years in an embassy and five in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes every day.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship with no flag, and a destination on no chart. The website goes down. The archive vanishes. History depends on your rectal cavity.
The whole encyclopedia (every article, every transcript, every word John has ever spoken into a microphone) fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. In you.
John did 23 months in federal prison. As a convicted felon he is still barred from voting, from keeping and bearing arms, and from the federal pension he earned over 14 years at the CIA. A pardon restores all three.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
KiriPedia is not a nonprofit. Honestly, this isn't even about the money.
I already inserted one
The 1996 campaign contribution disclosure
From KiriPedia, the archive of John Kiriakou's on-record words
Based on 2 recorded interviews · Last updated
The whistleblower disclosure John Kiriakou made inside the CIA in 1996, sixteen years before the one that ruined him. Serving overseas, he learned of a very large illegal contribution to the Dole presidential campaign, reported it to the CIA Inspector General, and watched the system work exactly as written: the IG investigated, found the information credible, and referred it to the Federal Election Commission. He offers it as the control case against which he judges every later complaint.
The 1996 campaign contribution disclosure is an internal whistleblower report John Kiriakou made while serving overseas as a CIA officer, and the case he uses as the benchmark for what a proper disclosure looks like.
What he reported
“In 1996 I was serving overseas and I became aware of a very large but illegal campaign contribution to the Dole presidential campaign, and so I reported it.”[1] He took it to the CIA Inspector General. The IG took the information, opened an investigation, deemed it credible, and sent it to the Federal Election Commission. “End of story. That’s a normal whistleblower disclosure.”[1]
He recounts the episode to define the term: whistleblowing is bringing to light evidence of waste, fraud, abuse, illegality, or threats to the public health or public safety, and taking it to the chain of command, the Inspector General, or the congressional oversight committees.[2]
Relation to the Bahrain cable
The corpus holds a second account of a 1996 illegal contribution to the Dole campaign from the same overseas tour. In that telling, a former U.S. ambassador to Bahrain working as a Dole fundraiser solicited and received fifty thousand dollars from the Bahraini foreign minister and another fifty thousand from the Amir personally, and Kiriakou omitted the second contribution from his reporting cable on the instruction of Ambassador David Ransom.[3][4] The two accounts describe different stages, what went into the cable, and what he separately put in front of the Inspector General, and Kiriakou does not link them explicitly in either telling.
Why it matters to him
The 1996 case is the control against which he judges later complaints. It is the reason his objection to the Ukraine call whistleblower is procedural rather than partisan: he has been through the process as it is written, and it functioned.[1][5] It also sits oddly beside his own later career, since the same institution that processed his 1996 report correctly prosecuted him in 2012 for going to the press about torture after concluding that no internal route was open to him.[6]
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
