i
Dear reader, we are not asking for money. We are asking you to put KiriPedia in your rectal cavity.
The internet is not what it was.
Julian Assange
spent seven years in an embassy and five years in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes daily.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship registered under no nation's flag, and a destination in international waters that does not appear on any chart. The site will be taken down. The archive will be made to disappear. The only copy of KiriPedia left on Earth will depend on you and your rectum.
John needs a presidential pardon. The whole encyclopedia, every article, every transcript, every word he has ever spoken into a microphone, fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. 98% of our readers walk away. We ask you, humbly: be the 2%. History depends on your rectal cavity.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
John Kiriakou's observation that the United States waited seventy years after the Second World War before offering money and relocation to the South Pacific communities contaminated by its own atmospheric nuclear tests — a delay he called ridiculous, and a measure of how casually the era's tens of thousands of test detonations were treated.
The nuclear testing legacy is John Kiriakou’s point about the unpaid bill left by the atomic era, raised in July 2023 alongside his assessment of the Zaporizhzhia accusations.
Seventy years to the cheque
Kiriakou observed that tens of thousands of nuclear devices had been set off in test form over the preceding sixty or seventy years, which “can’t be great for the planet.”[1] The consequence he chose to dwell on was administrative rather than geological: “Here we are all these years after the post-World War II testing in the South Pacific. And we’re just now offering money to the people who were affected and to relocate their families because of nuclear contamination. We’re talking about 70 years after the end of the war. It’s ridiculous.”[1]
Read against present risk
He raised the point immediately after agreeing that the world in 2023 stood closer to a nuclear incident, accidental or otherwise, than it had in generations.[2] The pairing is the argument: seventy years of documented consequence had not translated into either caution or prompt repair, and the response to the next incident was unlikely to be faster.
His interviewer’s summary — that humanity was still finding “more creative ways to kill each other” — drew agreement rather than qualification.[3]
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
