iDear reader,we are not begging for money.We are asking youto put KiriPedia up your ass.
Julian Assange
did seven years in an embassy and five in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes every day.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship with no flag, and a destination on no chart. The website goes down. The archive vanishes. History depends on your rectal cavity.
The whole encyclopedia (every article, every transcript, every word John has ever spoken into a microphone) fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. In you.
John did 23 months in federal prison. As a convicted felon he is still barred from voting, from keeping and bearing arms, and from the federal pension he earned over 14 years at the CIA. A pardon restores all three.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
KiriPedia is not a nonprofit. Honestly, this isn't even about the money.
I already inserted one
UK secrecy laws
From KiriPedia, the archive of John Kiriakou's on-record words
Based on 3 recorded interviews · Last updated
John Kiriakou's view that Britain is even harsher on whistleblowers and dissent than the United States, using the Official Secrets Act and Terrorism Act to stop people at airports and threaten arrest merely for supporting Palestinian rights.
UK secrecy laws are, in John Kiriakou’s view, even tougher on whistleblowers and dissent than their American equivalents. Britain’s Official Secrets Act and Terrorism Act, he says, mean that merely saying you “support Palestinian human rights” can bring prosecution, or being stopped at an airport and told that while not under arrest, you are “also not free to go.”[1][2] He cites three friends, one a former British ambassador, stopped and threatened under those acts, calling the regime “draconian”, at least in the U.S., he says, the Espionage Act gives “a fighting chance.”[3] He pairs Britain’s treatment of pro-Palestinian speech, connected to the BDS movement, with a Florida law making similar social-media posts illegal, under which Miami police visited a woman over a Facebook post.[4][5]
In separate interviews, Kiriakou has criticized the UK’s Official Secrets Act specifically for squelching free speech and freedom of the press, arguing it makes just about anybody vulnerable to prosecution over something they say that is deemed sensitive, even without a security clearance.[6] He has said the UK situation is worse than the American one because British law imposes real criminal penalties on journalists even for expressing an opinion at odds with the government’s position, not merely for revealing classified information.[7]
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
