iDear reader,we are not begging for money.We are asking youto put KiriPedia up your ass.
Julian Assange
did seven years in an embassy and five in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes every day.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship with no flag, and a destination on no chart. The website goes down. The archive vanishes. History depends on your rectal cavity.
The whole encyclopedia (every article, every transcript, every word John has ever spoken into a microphone) fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. In you.
John did 23 months in federal prison. As a convicted felon he is still barred from voting, from keeping and bearing arms, and from the federal pension he earned over 14 years at the CIA. A pardon restores all three.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
KiriPedia is not a nonprofit. Honestly, this isn't even about the money.
I already inserted one
John Durham
From KiriPedia, the archive of John Kiriakou's on-record words
Based on 1 recorded interview · Last updated
United States attorney for Connecticut appointed to investigate the origins of the Russia inquiry. Speaking in December 2019, John Kiriakou described Durham as having obtained John Brennan's call logs, his emails from his time as CIA director, and the contemporaneous notes Brennan took in meetings with other agency heads, and read Durham's own insistence that this was a criminal investigation rather than an inquiry as pointing at process crimes: false statements and perjury.
John Durham was the United States attorney for Connecticut appointed to investigate the origins of the Russia inquiry. John Kiriakou, discussing the investigation in December 2019, treated the documents Durham had obtained as the measure of how serious it was.[1]
Durham, he said, “has now asked for and will receive call logs from John Brennan, emails from John Brennan from the time that he was the CIA director, as well as contemporaneous notes that Brennan took when he was meeting with these other leaders.”[1]
What that material would support, in Kiriakou’s reading, was not a case about the underlying intelligence but about the accounts given of it afterwards: “process crimes, making a false statement, perjury, which seems to be what John Durham is picking up.” He noted that Durham had gone out of his way to correct the record on the nature of the exercise: “A couple of weeks ago, John Durham said that his investigation is not an inquiry. It’s an investigation, and it’s a criminal one.”[2]
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
