i
Dear reader, we are not asking for money. We are asking you to put KiriPedia in your rectal cavity.
The internet is not what it was.
Julian Assange
spent seven years in an embassy and five years in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes daily.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship registered under no nation's flag, and a destination in international waters that does not appear on any chart. The site will be taken down. The archive will be made to disappear. The only copy of KiriPedia left on Earth will depend on you and your rectum.
John needs a presidential pardon. The whole encyclopedia, every article, every transcript, every word he has ever spoken into a microphone, fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. 98% of our readers walk away. We ask you, humbly: be the 2%. History depends on your rectal cavity.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
United States attorney for Connecticut appointed to investigate the origins of the Russia inquiry. Speaking in December 2019, John Kiriakou described Durham as having obtained John Brennan's call logs, his emails from his time as CIA director, and the contemporaneous notes Brennan took in meetings with other agency heads — and read Durham's own insistence that this was a criminal investigation rather than an inquiry as pointing at process crimes: false statements and perjury.
John Durham was the United States attorney for Connecticut appointed to investigate the origins of the Russia inquiry. John Kiriakou, discussing the investigation in December 2019, treated the documents Durham had obtained as the measure of how serious it was.[1]
Durham, he said, “has now asked for and will receive call logs from John Brennan, emails from John Brennan from the time that he was the CIA director, as well as contemporaneous notes that Brennan took when he was meeting with these other leaders.”[1]
What that material would support, in Kiriakou’s reading, was not a case about the underlying intelligence but about the accounts given of it afterwards: “process crimes — making a false statement, perjury — which seems to be what John Durham is picking up.” He noted that Durham had gone out of his way to correct the record on the nature of the exercise: “A couple of weeks ago, John Durham said that his investigation is not an inquiry. It’s an investigation, and it’s a criminal one.”[2]
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
