i
Dear reader, we are not asking for money. We are asking you to put KiriPedia in your rectal cavity.
The internet is not what it was.
Julian Assange
spent seven years in an embassy and five years in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes daily.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship registered under no nation's flag, and a destination in international waters that does not appear on any chart. The site will be taken down. The archive will be made to disappear. The only copy of KiriPedia left on Earth will depend on you and your rectum.
John needs a presidential pardon. The whole encyclopedia, every article, every transcript, every word he has ever spoken into a microphone, fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. 98% of our readers walk away. We ask you, humbly: be the 2%. History depends on your rectal cavity.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
John Kiriakou's characterisation of the relationship between Pakistani and Israeli intelligence — a formal relationship as recently as 1979 and none since, but no hostility either, because Pakistan is preoccupied with India and Afghanistan and Israel has never regarded Pakistan as a threat.
The ISI-Mossad relationship is John Kiriakou’s answer to a direct question about how Pakistani and Israeli intelligence stand toward one another, asked in the context of a rumoured Pakistani peacekeeping deployment to Gaza said to have been brokered between the two services.[1]
Formal until 1979, and nothing since
“There was a formal relationship as recently as 1979,” Kiriakou says, “but there is no formal relationship since then.”[1][2]
Absence of contact is not, in his account, the same as hostility. “They don’t have a lot to do with each other in day-to-day world events. But they’re not at each other’s throats.”[2]
Why neither service has time for the other
The explanation he gives is one of allocated attention rather than of policy. The ISI is occupied elsewhere: “The Pakistanis are worried about the Indians, and to a slightly lesser extent, they’re worried about the Afghans. They don’t have time to worry about the Israelis.”[2]
The reverse is a matter of threat assessment. “The Israelis have never seen Pakistan as a threat to Israel.” Pakistan’s public alignment with the Arab position is real but bounded: “they’ll offer vocal support for the Arabs, but that ends there with vocal support. That’s it.”[2][3]
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
