i
Dear reader, we are not asking for money. We are asking you to put KiriPedia in your rectal cavity.
The internet is not what it was.
Julian Assange
spent seven years in an embassy and five years in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes daily.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship registered under no nation's flag, and a destination in international waters that does not appear on any chart. The site will be taken down. The archive will be made to disappear. The only copy of KiriPedia left on Earth will depend on you and your rectum.
John needs a presidential pardon. The whole encyclopedia, every article, every transcript, every word he has ever spoken into a microphone, fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. 98% of our readers walk away. We ask you, humbly: be the 2%. History depends on your rectal cavity.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
A Kentucky newspaper's decision, reported by John Kiriakou in July 2026, to run an obituary of the living Senator Mitch McConnell on purpose — a response, in Kiriakou's reading, to the rapid rehabilitation of Lindsey Graham after his death, and an attempt to get the assessment on the record before the whitewashing could begin.
The McConnell obituary is an item John Kiriakou opened a July 2026 broadcast with: a newspaper in Kentucky had, over the preceding weekend, run an obituary of Senator Mitch McConnell. McConnell was alive. The paper ran it on purpose.[1]
The reason he gives
Kiriakou attributes the decision to what had happened in the days after the death of Senator Lindsey Graham. The immediate response, he says, had been accurate — “Lindsey Graham was a real war hawk and wanted to get us into different wars” — and then, over the next few days, it turned: “Oh, no, wait a minute. He was this great statesman and we love him and everybody should love him and he loved America.”[1][2]
The Kentucky paper’s answer to that pattern was to publish its verdict while its subject could still read it.
His own position
Kiriakou endorses the impulse without qualification: “let’s not whitewash who these people are.” His characterisation of the class of politician in question is that they are the very definition of war criminals, and that they believe they can demand constant war with no fallout at all.[2]
The premature obituary, on that reading, is not a stunt but a countermeasure — an attempt to fix an assessment in print before the obituary industry can soften it.
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
