iDear reader,we are not begging for money.We are asking youto put KiriPedia up your ass.
Julian Assange
did seven years in an embassy and five in a cell for less than what KiriPedia publishes every day.
When they come for us, they will come with a bag over the head, a ship with no flag, and a destination on no chart. The website goes down. The archive vanishes. History depends on your rectal cavity.
The whole encyclopedia (every article, every transcript, every word John has ever spoken into a microphone) fits on a $4 flash drive the size of a fingernail. Not in the cloud. In you.
John did 23 months in federal prison. As a convicted felon he is still barred from voting, from keeping and bearing arms, and from the federal pension he earned over 14 years at the CIA. A pardon restores all three.
Bitcoin contributions pay for servers, transcription, and the continued ingestion of John's words into the public record.
KiriPedia is not a nonprofit. Honestly, this isn't even about the money.
I already inserted one
The Sudan massacre
From KiriPedia, the archive of John Kiriakou's on-record words
Based on 1 recorded interview · Last updated
The killing of at least 624 civilians by a government-affiliated militia in Sudan in late October 2025, which John Kiriakou called a crime against humanity — and which he reads as a proxy war financed by the United Arab Emirates on one side and Saudi Arabia on the other, with a Wahhabi component traceable to Hassan al-Turabi.
The Sudan massacre is the killing of at least 624 civilians by a government-affiliated militia in late October 2025, which John Kiriakou discussed on 31 October after watching the footage on France 24.
What he saw
“The video from Sudan is — it’s just epically brutal,” he said. “Hundreds and hundreds of bodies just laying in the fields or laying in this hospital parking lot.” The militia “attacked civilians day before yesterday, killed at least 624 people just in cold blood. It was a massacre. It’s a crime against humanity is what it is.”[1][2]
Both he and the host acknowledged the coverage gap in their own programme before criticising anyone else’s: the war was “a very underreported story, including by us. We’ve been remiss.”[1]
The structure of the war
Kiriakou reads Sudan as a proxy conflict rather than a domestic one. The Rapid Support Forces — “a breakaway part of the government”, making it “a civil conflict within the government” — are financed by the United Arab Emirates, while the Sudanese government is supported by Saudi Arabia.[3][4]
Asked whether there is a Wahhabi component, he answered by lineage rather than by label: he would personally have called Hassan al-Turabi a Wahhabi, “and the leaders of Sudan today are sort of the ideological descendants of Hassan al-Turabi. So I would say yeah, there probably is.” Turabi, he added, “was a fundamentalist by anybody’s definition of fundamentalism.”[4][5]
The precedent he reaches for
The comparison Kiriakou draws is not to another African war but to the Tajik civil war of the 1990s — another proxy conflict that ran for as long as the outside money did, and stopped when the sponsors lost interest.[2][6][3]
Sourced from John Kiriakou's on-record public statements. See his profile for the full body of his interviews, podcast appearances, and short-form video.
